Friday, September 20, 2019

Republican Excuses to Stir Up Fear


Back in the 1980s, the Republican Party, under Ronald Reagan, was extremely upset about the Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua, that put Daniel Ortega in power. Reagan was so upset about Ortega that he committed an illegal action, now known as the Iran-Contra affair. He was behind the sale of arms to Iran, a county that he recognized as a terrorist state! The purpose of the sale, which was treasonous, was to raise money to give to the Contras, which were terrorists who used violence against civilians in an attempt to demolish the Sandinista revolution. Reagan was, in two ways, a supporter of terrorism. A summary is here.

Ortega held onto power through a democratic election. Later, he lost an election to Violetta Chamorro, and Ortega and his party stepped aside, once again a democratic move. Ortega was not a dictator.

However, today, Daniel Ortega really is a dictator, but the Republicans have nothing to say about him.

In the 1980s, Ortega was an excuse for Republicans to illegally grab hold of secret power in America. Today, the Republicans are using immigrants as an excuse to illegally grab power. The Republicans never really cared one way or the other about whether Ortega was a dictator.

In the 1970s, if you did not support the Vietnam War, you were a traitor to America. In the 1980s, if you did not hate Daniel Ortega, you were a traitor to America. In the 2000s, if you questioned the Iraq War, you were a traitor to America. Today, Donald Trump says the Iraq war was stupid, but if you do not denounce immigrants, or even American-born offspring of immigrants, you are a traitor to America.

Republicans define “traitor” as “whoever questions our right to have dictatorial power” and have always done so.

Friday, September 13, 2019

Mass Shootings: Everything Is Just As It Should Be


Donald Trump has recently announced that there is no need for any strengthening of background checks, certainly no need for any further gun regulation, in the United States. In doing so, he was following orders from the NRA, whose advice he admitted was very, very important to him. Therefore, it appears, everything is exactly as it should be. We have exactly the right amount of gun safety, and the mass shootings that we have had and continue to have—I haven’t checked the news yet today—is a small price to pay for the freedom of crazy people to carry guns around and be ready to use them at a moment’s notice. From the Trump-NRA viewpoint, there should be no legal restrictions on firearms, until the moment the first shot is fired, and then the gunman should be neutralized.

I would like to present here a list of the deadliest mass shootings since 1949, according to an article published August 19, 2019, on CNN.


Number killed
Year
Place
Shooter/s
58
2017
Las Vegas
White man
49
2016
Orlando
Arab man
32
2007
Virginia Tech
Asian man
27
2012
Sandy Hook CT
White man
26*
2017
Sutherland Springs TX
White man
23
1991
Killeen TX
White man
22
2019
El Paso
White man
21
1984
San Ysidro CA
White man
18
1966
University of Texas
White man
17
2018
High school in Florida
White youth
14*
2015
San Bernardino CA
Arab couple
13
2009
Binghamton NY
Asian man
13
1999
Columbine CO
White youths
13
1983
Seattle WA
Asian men
13
1982
Wilkes-Barre PA
Black man
13
1949
Camden NJ
White man
12
2019
Virginia Beach
Black man
12
2018
Thousand Oaks CA
White man
12
2013
Washington Navy Yard
Black man
12
2012
Aurora CO
White man
12
1999
Atlanta
White man
11
2018
Pittsburgh synagogue
White man
10
2018
Santa Fe TX
White youth
10
2009
Alabama
White man
491
Total


*includes unborn child


This, apparently, is an acceptable situation. Let us consider these data a little further:

Ethnicity                     Incidents         Deaths
White man                   15                    279
Arabs                           3                      77
Asian man/men           3                      58
White youth/s              3                      40
Black man                   3                      37
Total                            27                    491

From this tabulation, we can see that all ethnicities are capable of mass violence, but it is overwhelmingly a phenomenon of white males.

These incidents have become much much much much more common in recent years. Consider this tabulation:

Year                Incidents         Deaths
1949                1                      13
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966                1                      18
1697
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982                1                      13
1983                1                      13
1984                1                      21
1985
1986                1                      14
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991                1                      23
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999                2                      25
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007                1                      32
2008
2009                3                      37
2010
2011
2012                2                      39
2013                1                      12
2014
2015                1                      14
2016                1                      49
2017                2                      84
2018                4                      50
2019                2                      34

There has been a huge acceleration of mass shootings. This is also, apparently, a situation that is acceptable to Trump and the NRA. And 2019 isn’t even over yet. I am not predicting that this acceleration will continue, but the rate will certainly not decline. Other countries such as France think we are freaking crazy. Their conclusion is understandable.

This essay, with an additional paragraph at the end, also appeared on my science blog.

Saturday, September 7, 2019

Just When We Thought We Had Seen Everything: Sharpiegate

We have become accustomed to Donald Trump considering Himself to be personally inerrant on every subject about which he comments, and that His worshipers believe everything He says even after it has been proven wrong. This is the kind of behavior that you would expect to see from God and His worshipers. Does Donald Trump fantasize that He is God? This started with the very first day of His administration, in which He claimed that His inauguration was the biggest one in American history, photographic evidence to the contrary. And it continues at this moment with Sharpiegate.

At first, there appeared to at least be understandable motives for Trump’s lies. He wants us to think that He is the most popular president in American history, despite the fact that Hillary Clinton got more votes. That is, Donald Trump lost the popular vote. He was one of only four American presidents to win the electoral vote but lose the popular vote. The other three were George W. Bush, Rutherford Hayes, and Benjamin Harrison—all Republicans. (John Quincy Adams, who was president before the modern Republican and Democratic parties existed, also lost the electoral vote, but was selected by the House of Representatives. The fact that Trump legitimately won the election was not good enough. He has a psychological need to be at the very top, not just of votes but of inaugural attendees.

But what possible reason could there be for Sharpiegate? As Hurricane Dorian approached the United States in late August, 2019, the National Weather Service used their standard computer programs and the most current data to predict the most likely path of the hurricane. At that time, they believed that Florida would receive a direct hit. To everyone’s surprise, Dorian turned and went north along the Atlantic coast. At no time did the NWS scientists predict that the hurricane would have a significant impact on Alabama.

But Donald Trump insisted that it would. At a press conference, he held up a placard that showed the NWS-predicted path, which did not include Alabama. But this graph had a line drawn on it that included southern Alabama. It had apparently been drawn on the graph with a blue sharpie. The NWS scientists said that this prediction was wrong. But the top administrators of NOAA, the agency that includes NWS, defended the president. (They, unlike the career scientists, are execute appointees.)


[Photo from the New Yorker]

I, for one, cannot imagine how making His own weather prediction could possibly help Trump’s image. My guess is that He probably did it just because He thinks He can command the winds and the waves the way the Bible says that Jesus did.

At no previous point in American history has scientific thinking been in such danger. For the first time, we have a president Who considers Himself to be an authoritative source of scientific data, literally out of thin air. It is no longer just major concepts such as evolution and global warming that are at risk, but the very data themselves. The Great God Donald Trump creates Truth. I always thought Christians believed that only God could do that.

Tuesday, September 3, 2019

George Washington Carver: A Constructive Form of Faith


When we think of Christians in science, we automatically think of the creationists and the Intelligent Design people whose major work is to destroy some of the most amazingly successful aspects of modern science, specifically evolution. But this is not the kind of faith that George Washington Carver had. In the previous essay, I explored ideas about Carver’s theistic way of doing science. In this essay, I want to look a little more closely at his religious faith.

Carver not only conducted botanical and chemical research, and taught classes, at Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, but for decades he also taught a very popular Bible study class. He was a very devout Christian but was not a fundamentalist. When Mahatma Gandhi corresponded with him, he did not denounce Gandhi’s non-Christian religious beliefs.

On one occasion, typical of many others, Carver wrote,

We make our own hell or heaven. We bring upon ourselves little moments of hell when we think and act a little meanly toward a fellow student or a fellow American, black or white. When our thoughts—which bring actions—are filled with hate against anyone, Negro or white, we are in a living hell. That is as real as hell will ever be.

Carver had no children of his own and was never known to have had any interest in women. Some people have claimed that Carver was gay. According to one website, “Carver never married or expressed interest in dating women, and rumors circulated about his sexuality at Tuskegee Institute while he was an employee. In particular, his enjoyment of giving “therapeutic” peanut oil massages to and engaging in horseplay with handsome men was seen as unusual. Late in his career, Carver established a life and research partnership with another male scientist, Austin Wingate Curtis, Jr. The two men cohabitated from 1934 until Carver’s death in 1943. Carver and Curtis kept details of their lives discreet, and as such historians know little about how these men understood their relationship. Nonetheless, the fact that Carver willed his assets to Curtis testifies to the significance of their relationship.” This is not proof one way or the other about Carver’s orientation. We simply do not know.

But Carver did frequently refer to his students as his children, and to them he addressed his “eight cardinal virtues”:

Be clean both inside and outside.
Who neither looks up to the rich or down on the poor.
Who loses, if need be, without squealing.
Who wins without bragging.
Who is always considerate of women, children, and old people.
Who is too brave to lie.
Who is too generous to cheat.
Who takes his share of the world and lets other people have theirs.

This is the kind of religion that we can all admire. Even in this way, what is there to not admire about George Washington Carver?