This
is the title of an 1890 French novel by Émile Zola. I read an English
translation that retained the original French title. (The e-circumflex, ê,
indicates that there used to be an s in the word. The word is obviously the
equivalent of our “beast.”) Zola’s novels were scandalous at the time. This
novel has a complex and compelling plot in which the evil desires of nearly all
of the characters weave together into a web of murder. I don’t think a single
main character was left alive at the end. You like train wrecks? This novel has
two.
Zola’s
reason for writing this novel, and many others, was to explore what it means to
understand that we evolved from wild and savage animals. He makes no mention of
evolution per se, but no reader at the time could miss his message. Speakers
such as Herbert Spencer, and even preachers like Henry Ward Beecher, went
around saying evolution was God’s way of ennobling us. Zola had a different
view: evolution condemned us, rather than ennobling us.
This
view of the human beast also meant that if someone was in the way of what you
wanted to have, whether money or sex, you simply got them out of the way. One
of the main characters, the woman Séverine, with whom nearly all of the men
were in love and who took advantage of their weaknesses, thought to herself
(about killing her husband), “He was in the way, so you got rid of him; what
could be more natural?”
But
these views were based on an understanding of evolution that we now know to be
incorrect. The human beast was not just violent and aggressive; when Zola
wrote, “The woman belonged to the [cave]man who could kill his rivals,” he was
only partly right. Human nature also includes love and altruism. It is
instinctual for us to be bad; it is also instinctual for us to be good. I have
written frequently about altruism. Zola was therefore wrong, but so were most
scientists. His characters thought, evolution has made me evil; but, in
fact, evolution had made them both evil and good at the same time. (One
of the characters had a psychiatric disorder; for him, perhaps, being good was
impossible.)
The
final scene is unforgettable. The only two main characters left alive, two
train operators, hated each other because they both loved a woman whom one of
them had just murdered. As the train moved at full speed, the men struggled and
both fell off the train. The uncontrollable train, full of soldiers headed off
to the front in the Franco-Prussian War, flew off to an inevitable catastrophe
that even Zola did not dare to write about. This is the picture Zola leaves us
with about what the world is like: it is a train on which selfish and clueless
humans ride to their destruction.
The
real “bête humaine” was society. That is, what some scientists today call the
superorganism. No matter what happened, whether murders or train wrecks, the
trains were back on their normal schedules with a delay of, at most, one day.
The trains, the machine of life, all of society, continue on as if nothing good
or (usually) bad has happened in any individual lives.
