Pretty
far, but not far enough.
I
now present a second reason why orthodox religion (as opposed to religious
sensibility or mysticism) is really bad for the human species.
The
religious conservatives believe that God has given them absolute truth; they
are God’s chosen, and the rest of us are God’s enemies; they are saved, we are
damned.
In
the past, religious conservatives took this belief to mean that they have the
right to torture and kill anyone who disagreed with them, whether brown-skinned
pagans or white-skinned heretics. Today, of course, they do not do this. They
will lie about us in order to get their followers to hate us, but they will not
torture or kill us.
But
why not? If in fact they are God’s chosen, why shouldn’t they kill us? After
all, Joshua killed the Canaanites, putting entire cities to the sword.
Religious conservatives say this was right. But they will not put us to the
sword, because…why? Perhaps, that’s just not done anymore. Or perhaps it is
because they recognize the authority of human governments, which declare murder
to be illegal, even if it is done in the name of God. But if God is the same
for all time, then if he commanded genocide in the past, he could do so again.
So
they will not kill us. But the basis for their refusal to kill us is operational, not fundamental. Read that
again. They have operational, not
fundamental, reasons to not kill us. They believe God gives them the right
to, but has indicated that this is not the right time or place to do so.
But
even recent history shows how quickly an operational restraint can change. Just
a few years after the fall of Yugoslavian communism, genocide was raging across
the Balkan states.
There
is nothing fundamental in the refusal of religious conservatives to kill the
rest of us. It is purely operational. And if, by some means, they should become
convinced that the situation has changed and that God does, after all, want
them to kill us, then they will do so, though perhaps with some hesitation.
This can happen almost overnight. I prophesy that it will, and I fervently hope
I am wrong.
In
contrast, science provides a fundamental
reason to not kill people who disagree with you. And that fundamental reason is
that all of our conclusions, about what to believe and how to live, are
tentative. Scientists cannot (without no longer being scientists) kill heretics
because there are no heretics in science;
there are only people who are wrong. We never say “God has proclaimed that…”
but can only say “The evidence clearly indicates that…” In science, there
always remains a slight margin of possibility that we are wrong, even about the
most obvious things. Maybe the Sun really does go around the Earth, and God
just makes it look like it’s the other way around. Therefore scientists cannot
pass summary, lethal judgment on anybody on account of their beliefs. But
religious conservatives believe that there is no slight margin of possibility
of error.
Murderous
religious zeal, so common in the past and still so pervasive in large parts of
the world, remains within American religious conservatives like a tiny
population of bacteria, so tiny that most conservatives refuse to believe it is
there, just waiting to emerge when the conditions are right.
No comments:
Post a Comment