I know I have written about this topic
previously, but I have a new story to relate to you about it.
There is a certain state senator in
Oklahoma, whose name some of you know but which I will not here publish, who is
infamous for being an extreme creationist. (He represents me in the state
senate.) Every year he introduces legislation that supposedly protects the
rights of creationist students, rights that are already protected. He insists
on a top-down, big-government solution to a nonexistent problem, something you
would not expect from a Republican. He gets little support even from fellow
Republicans.
But it appears that he has open disdain
for God’s creation, if that is what nature is.
One of our best undergraduate students
presented a poster at the state capitol during a research symposium. State
representatives and senators were free to roam around and see the exciting
scientific research being done by undergraduates in Oklahoma. Our student’s
poster was about stream reclamation and the reduction of water pollution. She
won a prize for the quality of her work.
The state senator referred to above was
one of the ones who went around looking at the posters. He asked the student
whether her research was directly related to human health. She indicated that
it was indirectly related to human health, through the promotion of
environmental quality. The senator derisively wondered who would possibly fund
scientific research that was not directly related to human health. The student
indicated that it was sponsored, in part, by a federal grant. The senator
responded that wasting money was typical of the federal government.
This senator openly sneered at one of
the best undergrad students at the university in his own district. And he did so by openly stating that anything
having to do with the natural world was not worth studying. He was openly
dismissive of both science education and God’s creation.
This is not always the way Republicans
behave. Our local state representative, also a Republican, visited with the
student and was respectful of the quality of the work.
I suspect that, for this senator, creationism is merely a
political tool. When he campaigns, he can say that he is defending God against
the evil worshippers of Satan, which apparently includes many or most of his
fellow Republicans who do not support his extremism. This senator apparently
thinks that God was stupid for having created anything in the world other than
humans and those things that humans directly use. God created many species that
we not only do not use but do not even know; what kind of stupid God would have
created all these species without asking this senator’s permission first? Or,
more likely, this senator doesn’t really believe in God at all and just uses
God as a political tool.
I could respect environmentalist
creationists. I’m still waiting to find one.
No comments:
Post a Comment