The Biblical books of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and
Deuteronomy contain long lists of ritual laws that God supposedly communicated
directly to Moses on the holy mountain while the Israelites were wandering for
forty years in the wilderness of the Sinai Peninsula after escaping from
slavery in Egypt.
Among these ritual laws, there are many that could not
possibly apply to the nomadic Israelites. For example, they were supposed to
put blood on their doorposts. Wandering, tent-dwelling nomads don’t have
doorposts. They were also supposed to make ritual cakes out of wheat flour.
Wandering nomads don’t raise wheat.
It is clear to most scholars of the Bible that these
ritual commandments were projected backward from the period after Israel had
become a settled country, when they had doorposts and wheat fields. Most
likely, these rituals had become well established by the period of Greek
occupation, just before Roman occupation. The priests then projected their
rituals backward to the nomadic period of their history. By claiming that God
Himself had thundered the commandments from the mountain, the priests could
claim absolute authority (of God and of Moses) in matters of ritual and
doctrine.
But fundamentalists believe that God actually commanded
the Israelites to do all of these things, for example to use wheat flour (which
they did not have) for making ritual tortillas during the lifetime of Moses. As
far as I recall, the commandments in Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and
Deuteronomy do not say, “Someday, you will be able to keep these commandments.”
The commandments were given, period, some of them on pain of death.
The fundamentalists have set themselves up for this
problem. Instead of reading the Old Testament books as ritual, they insist that
they are history. The ridiculous situation of a poor wandering Israelite
finding himself condemned to death for not having wheat flour is the result not
of the ancient writings themselves, but of fundamentalist assumptions about
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment