It
still exists. Good luck finding it.
Christian
environmentalists today are largely obscured by the loud cacophany of Christian
Republicans who worship Donald Trump and his overt hatred of the Earth. Here
are a couple of Christian environmentalists who stand out against the polluted
tide of toxic religion:
Jim
Wallis, founder of Sojourners, who has stood for decades as a voice of
Christian conscience.
Katharine Hayhoe is a climate scientist at Texas Tech University, who believes that
Christians should take global climate change very very seriously.
There
are others, but you won’t hear about them. If you do a Google search for
Christian environmentalism, one of the first hits on your search will be an
article from the Christian Broadcasting Network, Pat Robertson’s platform, one
of the major sites for the extreme fundamentalist Republican gospel. They
report on one Christian pastor who holds services and wants to “defend God’s
creation.” They do not have any arguments to show that he is wrong. But they
dismiss all Christian environmentalism with this statement at the end: “the new wave of Christian
environmentalists are "God's Greens...waging holy war on behalf of an
embattled creation. But, critics ask, is this a truly divine cause -- or the
devil's work?” By critics, they mean themselves. A 2017 article in Christianity Today gave loyalty to
Donald Trump as one of the main reasons that evangelical Christians have
stopped supporting environmentalism. The Cornwall Alliance, a group that sounds
British, is actually an American evangelical Christian anti-environmental
organization; they call environmentalism “the Green Dragon” which must be slayed.
Things
have changed a lot since Loren Wilkinson wrote Earthkeeping in the 90’s. I reviewed it back when it first came out, for the American Scientific
Affiliation. I have recently
looked at the book again. Wilkinson recently retired from the Faculty of Regent
College, a Christian institution in Vancouver, an institute and a city that
American evangelicals consider ungodly.
Wilkinson
said some things that would get him lynched by American evangelicals today.
Good thing that he is Canadian, I guess. Among his assertions were the
following:
- We need to have fewer kids, because of the Earth’s population explosion. Evangelicals, in contrast, often champion the Quiverfull approach: God said in Genesis 1 that Adam and Eve should have as many kids as possible and “fill the Earth.” They ignore the fact that we have already filled the Earth and that it is now time for us to do something else. God also told Adam and Eve to make clothes for themselves out of animal skins. Does this commandment also apply to us?
- Christians should honor God’s gift of the Earth by honoring the minerals of the Earth, by recycling them, giving them new life, instead of wasting them. God’s natural world recycles everything; so should we.
- If in fact Earth operates as an integrated system (the Gaia Hypothesis of James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis), Wilkinson considered this to be evidence of God. In contrast, most evangelicals consider Gaia to be paganism.
- The Creator gave independence to creation, and it therefore has its own rights. God never said or intended for the creation to be raw materials for humans to plunder. The Fall of Adam (which evangelicals blame on Eve, and on women in general) created a division between each person and all others, humankind and the Earth, and even divisions within each person—a division Jesus wants to heal.
- Noah’s Ark was a very clear example of God wanting to save at least part of his creation from the destruction of the Flood which God intended as a punishment for human sin. God might have said, I don’t care, Noah, if you don’t like all these species; I command you to give them refuge. The Ark was in complete contradiction to the Tower of Babel, which was the symbol of mankind glorifying itself.
- Humans have dominion over the Earth, but Biblical dominion means for the dominator to bless the dominated. How can this be? A good king is supposed to bless the people, just as Jesus, whom Christians consider to be the ruler of the universe, blesses us. He even went so far as to say that humans should be saviors of Creation just as Jesus is the savior of humans.
- We humans are meant to be stewards of creation, not conquerors. There is no single way that a steward should take care of whatever is in his or her charge. For example, to be stewards of creation does not mean that every bit of natural landscape must be kept intact. Human existence would then be impossible. But it does mean that humans should try as hard as possible to take care of the Creation, and think of creative ways of doing so. In contrast, evangelicals are by and large satisfied with us destroying the Creation.
- Wilkinson said that Christians must study ecology so that they know how to be effective stewards. Not only that, but Christians should participate in protests to save the Earth.
One
can always hope that Christians such as Wallis and Hayhoe can turn the tide
within the evangelical community. But I, for one, am not anticipating that this
will happen soon, within my lifetime, or ever.
No comments:
Post a Comment